sandpile.org -- discussion forum

discussion forum

message

Name:	unknown
Date:	March 17, 2004 at 15:48:23
Subject:	Re: IA32e: SCASQ?
In Reply To:	Re: IA32e: SCASQ? by Antoine Leca on March 17, 2004 at 14:40:37
Text:	`\|\| The intel 64-bit manuals are full of typos, ommissions, and \|\| word-for-word copies of the amd 64-bit manuals. \|\| Looks like they put it together in a hurry. \| \| After studying it 2 years or more? ;-)A lot of past Intel documentation has been plagued by incomplete or even incorrect information. Why would IA-32e be any different? \| Well, now they have to make it better.` `Not really. Though IA-32e will eclipse AMD64 in terms of shipped processors, developers can always get the information from the horse's mouth, i.e. the AMD64 manuals. Who needs Intel? :-D`

post a followup message
(Be nice... or be blocked. Be technical... or be erased.)

`Name:`		`optional link title:`
`eMail:`		`optional link URL:`
`Subject:`		`optional image URL:`
	Insert line breaks by hand when only about one inch remains at the right side. Otherwise your message will be unreadable.
`Text:`	\|\|\| The intel 64-bit manuals are full of typos, ommissions, and \|\|\| word-for-word copies of the amd 64-bit manuals. \|\|\| Looks like they put it together in a hurry. \|\| \|\| After studying it 2 years or more? ;-) \| \| A lot of past Intel documentation has been plagued by incomplete \| or even incorrect information. Why would IA-32e be any different? \| \|\| Well, now they have to make it better. \| \| Not really. Though IA-32e will eclipse AMD64 in terms of shipped \| processors, developers can always get the information from the \| horse's mouth, i.e. the AMD64 manuals. Who needs Intel? :-D \|


	Note: The above eMail form fields may look unaligned if you are using a browser other than Netscape Navigator version 3.0.

currently posted followup messages
(You may have to press the RELOAD button of your browser.)